Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scheme of arrangement, involving transfer of certain properties and reduction of share capital, should be sanctioned.
Analysis: The petition sought sanction under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Regional Director raised no objection and only required compliance with Rule 85 read with Section 100 of the Companies Act, 1956 in view of the reduction of share capital. The company complied with the requirement. The Regional Director also stated that the scheme was not prejudicial to the interests of creditors and shareholders.
Conclusion: The scheme was sanctioned and the petition was made absolute in terms of the prayer clause.