Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of the remaining pre-deposit and stay of recovery in view of the disputed denial of Cenvat credit on coal duty paid by the supplier.
Analysis: The exemption notification applicable to coal manufactured in a mine was found to be subject to a condition and therefore not shown to be compulsorily available to the supplier as a matter of law. On that basis, the foundation for denying Cenvat credit, namely that the supplier was mandatorily bound to avail the exemption and that the amount paid could not be treated as duty, was considered weak at the stay stage. The Tribunal also noted that the appellant had already deposited Rs. 10 lakhs and that the cited authorities supported the claim for credit treatment of duty paid on inputs.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to waiver of the remaining pre-deposit and to stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.