Tax tribunal rules profit from sale of investments in insurance business not taxable for assessment year 2004-05.

The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the profit on the sale of investments in the general insurance business was not taxable for the assessment year 2004-05, post the deletion of Rule 5(b) under the I.T. Act. The tribunal held that even after the deletion of Rule 5(b), the profit on the sale of investments could not be taxed as income from other activities, contrary to the decisions of the AO and CIT(A). The tribunal's decision was supported by previous rulings and set aside the order of the CIT(A).

---

---

Issues Involved:
Taxability of profit on sale of investment in case of the assessee.

Analysis:
The appeal by the assessee challenged the order of CIT(A) regarding the taxability of profit on the sale of investments for the assessment year 2004-05. The assessee, engaged in general insurance business, earned a profit on the sale of investments, which was claimed as exempt in the return of income. The taxability of this profit was disputed based on the deletion of Rule 5(b) under the I.T. Act and the clarification provided by CBDT in circular No.528 regarding the tax treatment of such profits.

The assessee contended that post the deletion of Rule 5(b), the profit on the sale of investments in the general insurance business was not taxable. However, the AO disagreed, stating that the profit from the sale of investments, even after the deletion of Rule 5(b), had to be taxed as it was income from other activities. The CIT(A) also upheld this decision, emphasizing that the CBDT circular applied only to public sector insurance companies, not private sector ones.

The tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 44 read with Rule 5 of the 1st Schedule, noting that Rule 5(b) was applicable until assessment year 1988-89 and was deleted from assessment year 1989-90 onwards. Referring to the decision of the Pune Bench in a similar case, the tribunal concluded that post the deletion of Rule 5(b), profit on the sale of investments in general insurance companies could not be taxed under the I.T. Act. This decision was further supported by the Mumbai Bench in a related case. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the profit on the sale of investments for the assessment year 2004-05 was not taxable.

In conclusion, the tribunal set aside the order of CIT(A) and allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the profit on the sale of investments in the case of the assessee could not be taxed for the assessment year 2004-05.

---