TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Challenging Customs Tribunal Orders: Proper Remedy and Appeal Process Explained</h1> The Supreme Court held that the proper remedy for challenging an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal is before the High Court ... Benefit of Exemption Notification No.6/2006 – Duty free Naphtha used for the purpose other than manufacture of fertilizers – Maintainability of appeal - Section 35L - Held that:- this is not a fit case where court should entertain appeals under Section 35L of the Act - appellant, seeks withdrawal of the appeals to challenge the impugned order under Section 35G of the Act before the High Court - Appeal withdrawn. The Supreme Court held that the proper remedy for challenging an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal is before the High Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944. In this case, the appeals were permitted to be withdrawn to enable the appellant to challenge the impugned order under Section 35G of the Act before the High Court.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
