Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether NCCD was leviable on clearance of partially oriented yarn for captive consumption. (ii) Whether NCCD was leviable on clearance of partially oriented yarn to 100% export-oriented units.
Issue (i): Whether NCCD was leviable on clearance of partially oriented yarn for captive consumption.
Analysis: The issue was treated as no longer res integra, and the Tribunal accepted the settled view relied upon for captive consumption clearances. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that the levy of NCCD did not survive on such clearances.
Conclusion: NCCD was not leviable on clearance for captive consumption.
Issue (ii): Whether NCCD was leviable on clearance of partially oriented yarn to 100% export-oriented units.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the ratio of the decision relating to clearances under Notification No. 108/95-CE dated 28.8.95 and held that the same principle governed clearances to 100% export-oriented units. On that basis, the levy of NCCD on such clearances was negatived.
Conclusion: NCCD was not leviable on clearance to 100% export-oriented units.
Final Conclusion: The demand of NCCD, interest, and penalties did not survive and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the settled legal position excludes NCCD on the relevant category of clearances, the levy cannot be sustained on either captive consumption clearances or analogous clearances to 100% export-oriented units.