Government shares sale not taxable, Tribunal decision upheld, Revenue application rejected. The Tribunal ruled that no capital gain was chargeable on the sale of shares as they belonged to the Government and were transferred to the assessee at ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Government shares sale not taxable, Tribunal decision upheld, Revenue application rejected.
The Tribunal ruled that no capital gain was chargeable on the sale of shares as they belonged to the Government and were transferred to the assessee at zero cost of acquisition as a moral gesture. The Tribunal's decision was upheld by the High Court, which found that the Tribunal correctly applied the law and referred to relevant precedents. The application u/s 256(2) of the IT Act, 1961 by the Revenue was rejected as no further questions of law needed to be addressed.
Issues involved: Application u/s 256(2) of the IT Act, 1961 by Revenue raising questions on jurisdiction of Tribunal and taxability of surplus from sale of shares.
Jurisdiction of Tribunal: The respondent-assessee offered capital gains from sale of shares and securities for taxation, initially stating the cost as of 1st Jan., 1964, and later as the date of receipt from the Government of India. The CIT(A) upheld the assessment, leading to an appeal before the Tribunal where the assessee challenged the levy of capital gains on foreign shares. Despite objection by Revenue, the Tribunal allowed this new ground. The Tribunal ruled that no capital gain was chargeable as the shares belonged to the Government and were transferred to the assessee as a moral gesture, with zero cost of acquisition. The Tribunal's decision was based on precedents and rejected the Revenue's application for reference to the High Court.
Taxability of Surplus from Sale of Shares: The Tribunal's decision was upheld by the High Court, stating that the questions raised by the Revenue had already been addressed in previous cases. The Court found that the Tribunal correctly applied the law and referred to relevant precedents in reaching its decision. As a result, the application u/s 256(2) of the IT Act, 1961 was rejected, concluding that no further questions of law needed to be answered by the Court.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.