Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported laser printer was classifiable under Heading 8471 as an input or output unit of an automatic data processing machine, or under Heading 8443 as printing machinery.
Analysis: The printer was described and used as a laser jet printer connected to a computer, capable of receiving and storing data for printing. Chapter 84 Note 5(B) required a unit to be principally used in an automatic data processing system, connectable to the central processing unit, and able to accept or deliver data in a usable form. Note 5(D) specifically provided that printers satisfying the conditions in Note 5(B)(b) and 5(B)(c) were to be classified under Heading 8471. The printer did not use printing type, blocks, plates, cylinders, or other printing components of Heading 8442, and its mere size or capacity to print on different media did not alter its essential tariff identity. Rule 3(a) supported adoption of the most specific description, and Heading 8471 specifically covered laser jet printers.
Conclusion: The printer was correctly classifiable under Heading 8471, and not under Heading 8443, so the appeal by Revenue failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A printer that satisfies Chapter 84 Note 5(B) and is specifically covered by Note 5(D) is classifiable under Heading 8471, and a more general printing heading cannot prevail merely because the printer performs a printing function or has larger capabilities.