Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Exemption under Section 10B requires actual exports in convertible foreign exchange.</h1> <h3>M/s. Indus Medicare Private Limited Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 2 (1), Hyderabad</h3> M/s. Indus Medicare Private Limited Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 2 (1), Hyderabad - [2014] 34 ITR (Trib) 347 (ITAT [Hyd]) Issues Involved:1. Computation of relief under section 10B of the Income-tax Act.2. Eligibility for exemption under section 10B in respect of 'merchant exports.'3. Computation of exemption with reference to profits of business as per the Income-tax Act instead of book profit.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Computation of Relief under Section 10B:The primary grievance of the assessee pertains to the computation of relief under section 10B of the Income-tax Act. The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 2,52,37,535 under section 10B, which was restricted to Rs. 56,32,290 by the Assessing Officer. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this restriction, leading to the present appeal. The assessee contended that the net foreign exchange earnings (NFE) were in favor of the appellant, supporting its claim under section 10B. Additionally, the assessee argued that deemed exports should be considered as exports for the purpose of computation of deduction under section 10B.2. Eligibility for Exemption under Section 10B for 'Merchant Exports':The facts reveal that the assessee, a 100% export-oriented company, included certain sales made within India in its export turnover, claiming them as 'merchant exports.' The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) did not accept this inclusion, leading to the restriction of the claim. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of Swayam Consultancy P. Ltd. v. ITO [2011] 336 ITR 189 (AP), which held that for the purposes of the Income-tax Act, the law neither contemplates nor recognizes 'deemed exports.' The High Court emphasized that the term 'export' means taking goods out of India, and the benefit under section 10B is available only if the sale proceeds of articles or things exported out of India are received in convertible foreign exchange. The Tribunal, following this binding decision, upheld the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals).3. Computation of Exemption with Reference to Profits of Business as per the Income-tax Act:The assessee's grievance regarding the computation of exemption with reference to profits of business as per the Income-tax Act instead of book profit was also addressed. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) rejected the grounds on this aspect, noting that no arguments were advanced by the assessee and there was no merit in the claim. The Tribunal found no infirmity in this part of the order and rejected the ground of the assessee.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the decisions of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Tribunal confirmed that for the purpose of section 10B, the law does not recognize deemed exports and that the computation of exemption should be based on actual export out of India with proceeds received in convertible foreign exchange. The order was pronounced in the court on July 18, 2014.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found