Tribunal Upholds Limit on Depreciation Rate for Lorries

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to limit the depreciation rate on lorries used by the assessee to 15%. The assessee's argument that they were authorized to carry on the business of giving vehicles on hire was rejected, as their primary business of supplying metals included the transportation of metals, not a separate hire business. The Tribunal referred to precedents and a Circular to support the conclusion that the assessee was not entitled to a higher rate of depreciation. The appeal was dismissed on July 4, 2014.

---

---

Issues:
Rate of depreciation on lorries used by the assessee.

Analysis:
The appeal was against the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)'s order regarding the rate of depreciation on lorries used by the assessee for letting out on hire to clay contractors. The Assessing Officer disallowed the higher rate of 30% claimed by the assessee and limited it to 15%, as the assessee was deemed not in the business of giving lorries on hire. The Appellate Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both parties. The authorized representative of the assessee cited various judgments to support the claim that the assessee was authorized to carry on the business of giving vehicles on hire, and the hire charges were declared as business income. On the other hand, the Departmental representative argued that the arrangement between the assessee and contractors did not qualify for the higher rate of depreciation.

The Tribunal referred to a previous co-ordinate Bench decision where it was held that the assessee, not being engaged in the business of running vehicles on hire, was not entitled to a higher rate of depreciation. The Tribunal analyzed the nature of the work orders and the business activities of the assessee to determine whether the use of lorries for transportation was incidental to the main business. It was noted that the assessee's primary business was supplying metals, and the transportation of metals was considered part of this business, not a separate hire business. The Tribunal also cited other court decisions and a Circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes to support the conclusion that the assessee was not entitled to a higher rate of depreciation on vehicles used in their own business.

Based on the analysis and precedents cited, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, upholding the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to limit the depreciation rate to 15%. The judgment was pronounced on July 4, 2014.

---