Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rebate of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of exported goods was admissible when the declaration required under Notification No. 21/2004-C.E. (N.T.) was filed only after the export of the goods.
Analysis: Rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Notification No. 21/2004-C.E. (N.T.) is available only when the prescribed declaration and verification are completed before commencement of export. The notification makes prior declaration of input-output ratio, manufacture or processing details, and approval by the jurisdictional authority a mandatory condition for determining the correctness of the claim and preventing evasion. Here, the declaration was filed after the goods had already been exported, so the primary condition of the notification was not satisfied. In such circumstances, the use of duty-paid inputs in the exported goods could not be verified in the manner required by the scheme.
Conclusion: The rebate claim was not admissible and the rejection by the lower authorities was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a rebate notification requires prior declaration and approval before export, filing the declaration after export defeats the mandatory condition and disentitles the claimant from rebate.