Appeal success based on assessment challenge. Refund claim denied without challenging assessment.

The Appeal against the refund claim was allowed based on Supreme Court decisions. The Revenue contended that without challenging the assessment order, the refund is not maintainable, citing various decisions. The Respondent's claim was allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) based on improper assessment of finished goods, but it was found that duty was paid as per the assessment. The court held that without challenging the assessment order, the refund is not sustainable, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the Appeal in favor of the Revenue.

---

---

Revenue appealed against an order allowing a refund claim for duty paid on imported goods. Admitted facts: a bill of entry was assessed by the proper officer, duties were paid, and the assessment order was not challenged. Revenue relied on Karnataka Power Corpn. Ltd.; Priya Blue Industries (holding that "in absence of challenge to the assessment, the refund is not maintainable"); Tribunal and High Court decisions applying that principle. Respondent contended the finished goods were not assessed as per law and Commissioner (Appeals) rightly allowed refund. Tribunal found that where the assessment order is not challenged, post-assessment refund claims are deficient and the precedents relied upon support the proposition that a refund is not maintainable absent challenge to assessment. The Mumbai High Court's decision in Karan Associates was distinguished as Karnataka Power Corpn. had been remanded for re-classification, so its ratio did not aid an unchallenged-assessment case. Impugned order set aside; appeal allowed.

---