Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deeming provision in section 4(1)(a)(v) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 applied where the donee was not the son's wife on the date of the gift but became so later.
Analysis: The provision was construed to require that the relationship of son's wife must exist not only on the valuation date but also at the time when the gift is made. The Court followed the reasoning applied to the pari materia income-tax provision, under which the relevant relationship must subsist when the transfer takes effect. Since the gift had taken effect before the donee became the assessee's son's wife, the statutory condition for clubbing the gifted asset was not satisfied.
Conclusion: Section 4(1)(a)(v) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was held not to be attracted, and the addition of the gifted asset to the assessee's net wealth was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department, affirming that the gifted property could not be brought to tax under the deeming provision on the facts found.
Ratio Decidendi: A deeming provision that depends on a specified relationship applies only if that relationship exists when the transfer or gift takes effect, and not merely on the later valuation date.