Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of preventive detention made under the Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 was vitiated for want of relevant materials, proximity, compliance with statutory safeguards, or excess of authority.
Analysis: The detention was based on recent and proximate incidents showing alleged habitual criminal conduct affecting public order, together with background cases that were pending and had not ended in acquittal or termination. The Court held that the authority had acted on relevant materials and that the proximity of the incidents supported the conclusion that the detenu fell within the statutory description of an anti-social element. It further held that the safeguards under the Act were complied with, that the relevant documents had been supplied, and that the period of detention had been validly notified by the State Government. Applying the settled principle that preventive detention is to be tested on relevance, proximity, rationality, and reasonableness, the Court found no ground to interfere.
Conclusion: The detention order was upheld as lawful and within authority, and the challenge failed.