TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether diesel purchased against form C for cane procurement from sugarcane purchasing centres to the factory was used in violation of the purpose for which it was purchased so as to attract penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. (ii) Whether diesel purchased against form C for farm equipment maintenance and repair was used in violation of the purpose for which it was purchased so as to attract penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Issue (i): Whether diesel purchased against form C for cane procurement from sugarcane purchasing centres to the factory was used in violation of the purpose for which it was purchased so as to attract penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: The term in section 8(3)(b) permits purchase of goods for use in manufacture or processing of goods for sale. Sugarcane is the basic raw material for sugar, and under the regulatory scheme the factory is required to procure cane from reserved or assigned purchase centres and then transport it to the factory for crushing. Transportation from the purchase centres to the factory was treated as an essential and integrated step in the manufacture of sugar, since crushing cannot take place without such movement of cane to the pithead. Goods used in an activity integrally connected with manufacture qualify as goods used in manufacture or processing.
Conclusion: Diesel used for cane procurement from purchase centres to the factory did not amount to violation of the authorised purpose, and the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether diesel purchased against form C for farm equipment maintenance and repair was used in violation of the purpose for which it was purchased so as to attract penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: Farm equipment maintenance and repair was treated as part of the assessee's research and development and quality-improvement activity connected with sugar manufacture, including efforts to maintain quality and maximise yield from sugarcane. Such activity was regarded as integral to the manufacturing process and therefore within the scope of use authorised by section 8(3)(b).
Conclusion: Diesel used for farm equipment maintenance and repair did not amount to violation of the authorised purpose, and the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The penalty could not be sustained on either count, and the revisions succeeded with the Tribunal's contrary view set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A use is within section 8(3)(b) when it forms an integral and commercially necessary part of the manufacture or processing of goods for sale, including activities ancillary to the completion of the manufacturing process.
TaxTMI 
