Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a contract for transportation of goods amounts to a sale or works contract so as to attract value added tax under the TVAT Act.
Analysis: The definition of sale under section 2(25) of the TVAT Act covers transfer of property in goods, including specified deemed sales such as works contracts, hire-purchase transactions and transfer of the right to use goods. A pure contract for transporting goods from one place to another does not involve transfer of property in the goods, either directly or by inference. The statutory expansion of the expression transfer of property in goods in the context of works contracts cannot be extended to ordinary transportation of goods. Transportation charges may, in a proper case, form part of the value of goods in the hands of a person executing a works contract, but the transporter is not liable to pay tax merely for carrying goods on behalf of the consignor or consignee.
Conclusion: A transportation contract is not a sale or works contract for the purpose of tax under the TVAT Act, and tax deducted from the transporters was held to be illegal and liable to be quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Mere transportation of goods does not amount to transfer of property in goods, and the deeming fiction applicable to works contracts cannot be extended to fasten tax liability on a transporter.