Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether renovation expenses incurred by a coparcener on an ancestral house, to the extent of the brothers' shares, gave rise to a deemed gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The definition of gift under section 2(xii) is wide enough to include transactions deemed to be gifts under section 4. The amended scheme introduced by section 37 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1971 expressly covers situations where separate property is converted into joint family property or is thrown into the common stock, and deems the transferor to have made a gift of the share beneficially attributable to the other members. On the facts found, the house was treated as ancestral and the expenditure resulted in a benefit to the co-owners to the extent of their shares, bringing the case within the deeming provision.
Conclusion: The question is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the Revenue. The Tribunal was not right in holding that there was no element of deemed gift, and the amount attributable to the brothers' shares was liable to gift-tax.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by applying the statutory deeming fiction for gifts arising from conversion or appropriation of property within a Hindu undivided family context.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute deems a transfer or conversion of property to be a gift, the taxable incidence is attracted by the legal fiction even if the transaction does not amount to a conventional transfer for consideration.