Tariff classification for cut-off M.S. flats determines exemption eligibility under the notification and defeats the claim

Ends cut from M.S. flats were held not to fall within the claimed tariff sub-item for exemption under Notification No. 208/83, because the notification applied only where the inputs used for the final product themselves matched the specified sub-items. The Court found that such cut-offs were not pieces roughly shaped by rolling or forging, and their purchase from scrap dealers or use for metal recovery did not change that classification. A new attempt to place them under another sub-item was not considered because it was raised for the first time before the Court. Exemption was therefore unavailable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the ends of M.S. flats used as inputs fell within the relevant tariff sub-item so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 208/83.

Analysis: The notification granted exemption only when the inputs used for the final product fell within the specified sub-items. The Court held that ends cut from flats were not pieces roughly shaped by rolling or forging within the meaning of the claimed sub-item, and that such cut-offs did not become covered merely because they were purchased from scrap dealers or used for recovery of metal. The alternative contention that they could be brought within another sub-item was not entertained because it was raised for the first time before the Court.

Conclusion: The inputs did not fall within the claimed sub-item and the assessee was not entitled to exemption under the notification.

---