Abandoned film production costs treated as stock-in-trade, not capital asset, and appeal dismissed for no substantial question of law.

The Bombay HC found no substantial question of law in a dispute over whether the production cost of an abandoned, unreleased film could be claimed as a trading loss and whether the negative film was a capital asset. As the film had admittedly not been released, the expenditure was treated as relating to stock-in-trade rather than a capital asset. The appellate position had already been given effect to by the Assessing Officer, and the appeal was therefore held to be misconceived and dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the cost of production of the abandoned film was assessable as trading loss and whether the negative film was a capital asset rather than stock-in-trade.

Analysis: The appeal raised no substantial question of law. The film had admittedly not been released, and on that basis the expenditure was treated as relating to stock-in-trade rather than a capital asset. The appellate position had already been given effect to by the Assessing Officer.

Conclusion: The appeal was held to be misconceived and was dismissed.

---