Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the entire sum remitted from Saigon was taxable under section 4(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, or whether the amount had to be reduced by the loss on exchange.
Analysis: The sum received in British India was taxable only to the extent that it represented profits and gains brought into the country. The assessment could not proceed on a presumption that profits were remitted before capital, because the actual amount received depended on the exchange rate prevailing when the foreign currency was converted into rupees. The exchange loss formed part of the real commercial result of the overseas money-lending business and could not be treated as a loss of capital. The conversion of rupees into dollars and back again was necessary for earning and bringing home the profits, and the computation of taxable income had to take that loss into account. Section 10(2)(ix) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 supported allowance of expenditure incurred solely for earning the profits.
Conclusion: The whole sum of Rs. 23,252 was not taxable under section 4(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and the amount had to be reduced by the loss on exchange, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In computing taxable profits brought into British India, the real commercial value of the remittance must be taken into account, and exchange loss necessarily incurred in converting foreign receipts into Indian currency is deductible as part of the true profit computation.