Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the true construction of Rule 1 of Schedule II to the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Officer could revalue the assessee's trading stock at cost price higher than the figure adopted in the income-tax assessment for the standard period.
Analysis: The standard profits and the capital employed during the standard period were to be worked out under the Excess Profits Tax Act in a manner linked to the income-tax computation. The proviso to Rule 1 of Schedule I bound the Excess Profits Tax Officer to the profits already determined for the standard period under the Indian Income-tax Act. Rule 1(2) of Schedule II, read with the scheme of the Act, showed that deductions for reduced values of assets were those allowable for income-tax purposes, and that the officer could not disturb the opening or closing stock figures which formed part of the income-tax profit computation. The distinction between deductions that are "allowable" and debts "which has been allowed" did not authorise a fresh revaluation of trading stock.
Conclusion: The Excess Profits Tax Officer could not substitute a higher stock valuation for the value already adopted for income-tax purposes in computing the standard period profits and capital, and the question was answered against the Commissioner.