Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after a valid reopening of assessment under section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the reassessment is confined only to the item which triggered the reopening, or whether the Income-tax Officer may assess all income that had escaped assessment.
Analysis: Once proceedings are validly reopened under section 34, the reassessment is to be conducted de novo and the Income-tax Officer proceeds as in the original assessment by issuing notice under section 22(2). The assessee is under a duty to disclose the entirety of his total income, and there is no warrant for splitting escaped income into categories depending on whether the reopening was initiated under clause (a) or clause (b). The reopening provisions contemplate a fresh assessment of all income that has escaped assessment, and not merely the particular item that led to the reassessment notice.
Conclusion: The reassessment was not restricted to the item first discovered to have escaped assessment, and the impugned share income was validly includible in the reopened assessment.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the department, holding that a valid reassessment under section 34(1)(a) permits inclusion of all escaped income in the reassessment.
Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment lawfully initiated for escaped income is a fresh assessment proceeding, and once reopened, the tax authority may assess all income that escaped assessment, not merely the item that prompted reopening.