Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company was entitled, for income-tax purposes, to compute its profits on the base stock system instead of valuing stock at cost or market price, whichever is lower, and whether that method correctly reflected the full profits of the year of assessment.
Analysis: The company's base stock system excluded fixed process stock from the trading account and valued spare process stock at an arbitrary figure. The Court held that for income-tax purposes the true profits of the year could not be ascertained without bringing into account the value of stock at both the beginning and the end of the accounting period. The governing approach was that profits are to be computed on the full amount of the yearly profits or gains, and stock-in-trade is ordinarily to be valued at cost or market price, whichever is lower, in accordance with accepted commercial accounting applied consistently with the taxing provisions. On the facts found, the base stock method understated profits and created a distorted view of the relevant year's results.
Conclusion: The company was not entitled to have its profits computed for income-tax purposes according to the base stock system. The assessment on the Revenue's basis was upheld and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For income-tax computation, stock must be brought into account at the beginning and end of the year on a real valuation basis, and a commercially recognised accounting method cannot be used if it does not disclose the true profits of the year.