Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the unabsorbed portion of depreciation allowance amounting to Rs. 12,505 can be treated as a loss of profits under the head 'business' and apportioned among the partners of a registered firm under proviso 2 to Section 24(1) of the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The Court considered the statutory scheme comprising Sections 3, 4, 6, 10, 23 and 24 of the Income-tax Act and examined the interaction between clause (vi) of sub-section (2) of Section 10 (depreciation) and the set-off/carry-forward provisions of Section 24. The Court analysed proviso (b) to Section 10(2)(vi) which permits carrying forward of unabsorbed depreciation and the proviso to Section 24(2) which gives precedence to ordinary losses for set-off. Precedents from the Lahore, Madras and Nagpur High Courts were examined, which construed 'profits or gains' and allowed unabsorbed depreciation to be included in computing business loss and thereby available for set-off under Section 24. The Court held that allowances enumerated in Section 10(2), including depreciation, form part of computing profits or losses and that Section 24 permits a registered firm's loss (including that arising from depreciation) which cannot be fully set off by the firm to be apportioned between partners. The proviso giving preference to ordinary losses over depreciation merely governs order of set-off and does not exclude depreciation from being a revenue loss capable of apportionment.
Conclusion: The sum of Rs. 12,505 being the unabsorbed portion of depreciation allowance is a loss of profits under the head 'business' and can be apportioned among the partners of the registered firm under proviso 2 to Section 24(1) of the Income-tax Act; the reference is answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.