Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on reassessment under Section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, the Income Tax Officer could bring to tax only income that had actually escaped assessment, and whether the assessee could claim credit for an item said to have been over-assessed in the original assessment.
Analysis: Section 34 authorises reassessment only of income that has escaped assessment. The assessee cannot use reassessment proceedings to reopen the whole original assessment or to secure a reduction on some other head merely because a separate item was over-assessed. Where specific items were in fact under-assessed, that under-assessed portion constitutes income that escaped assessment. A separate over-assessment under another head does not entitle the assessee to set off or credit unless it is shown that the escaped item was in truth assessed under an inappropriate head.
Conclusion: The reassessment confined to the items that had escaped assessment was valid, and the assessee was not entitled to credit for the alleged over-assessment under another head.
Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment under Section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 is limited to income that has escaped assessment, and it does not permit an assessee to reopen the entire assessment or claim adjustment for over-assessment of a separate item.