Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid on money borrowed to meet income-tax liability for earlier years was an allowable deduction against the assessee's share of income from the firm.
Analysis: The assessee claimed the deduction under provisions relating to interest on capital borrowed for business, expenditure wholly and exclusively for business, and expenditure incurred solely for earning income from other sources. The borrowing was, however, made to pay income-tax, and no statutory provision was shown that permitted deduction of interest on such borrowing. Income-tax was treated as an application of profits after they were earned and not as expenditure incurred in earning income. Since no nexus existed between the claimed interest payment and any statutory allowance, the burden of establishing deductibility was not discharged.
Conclusion: The interest payment was not an allowable deduction and the question was answered against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was decided in favour of the revenue, holding that interest on borrowing to pay income-tax does not reduce taxable income in the absence of a specific statutory allowance.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest on money borrowed for payment of income-tax is not deductible unless the statute expressly permits such deduction; a liability incurred for discharge of tax is not expenditure incurred in earning taxable income.