TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court rules Assessing Officer lacks jurisdiction post certification under Companies Act</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd.</h3> The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling against the revenue's contentions. The judgment emphasized that once the balance sheet is certified under the ... - Issues:1. Excess claim of depreciation for machinery used for 9 days only.2. Allowability of full depreciation without considering Schedule XIV of the Companies Act.3. Compliance with section 211 of the Companies Act regarding true and fair picture of profits.Issue 1: Excess claim of depreciationThe assessee claimed depreciation for machinery used for only 9 days, resulting in an excess claim of depreciation. The Commissioner invoked section 263 of the Income Tax Act to rectify the error in allowing full depreciation. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order, leading to the current appeal.Issue 2: Allowability of full depreciationThe crux of the matter lies in whether full depreciation is permissible for the entire year when assets were used for a limited period. The Commissioner emphasized proportionate depreciation as per Schedule XIV of the Companies Act. However, the Tribunal overturned this decision, prompting the appeal by the revenue.Issue 3: Compliance with Companies Act section 211Section 211 mandates companies to present a balance sheet reflecting a true and fair view of their financial status. The debate centers on whether depreciation should be calculated pro rata from the asset addition date, as per Schedule XIV. The judgment references the case law of Apollo Tyres Limited, emphasizing the limited scope of the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction regarding net profit determination.In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling against the revenue's contentions. The judgment asserts that once the balance sheet is certified under the Companies Act, the Assessing Officer lacks jurisdiction to scrutinize the net profit shown in the profit and loss account. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and case law interpretations in determining depreciation and ensuring a true and fair representation of financial statements.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
