Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee is a "local authority" within the meaning of section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 3(31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and whether its income is exempt from tax.
Analysis: The expression "local authority" under section 3(31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 was applied in light of the tests laid down for bodies akin to municipal committees, district boards or port commissioners. The decisive features considered were separate corporate existence, autonomy, functional similarity to municipal bodies, popular representation, and control over a local fund. On the relevant statutory scheme, the market committee was a body corporate with a defined operational area, elected office-bearers, power to regulate markets, levy and collect fees, maintain a market fund, and perform functions connected with superintendence, direction and control of the market. These features satisfied the settled criteria for a local authority.
Conclusion: The committee was held to be a local authority and its income was held to be exempt under section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.