Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether untrained teachers appointed after the cutoff date could claim deemed government servant status and regularisation upon takeover of the school, and whether a mandamus could be issued contrary to the statutory scheme.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under Sections 3(2) and 3(4) made takeover of aided schools operative only after the committee's recommendation was accepted by the Government. Until that stage, the takeover was not complete and Section 4 operated only in respect of employees who were qualified and working before takeover. The Government's order under Section 8 also excluded untrained teachers appointed after 1.1.1971 from being taken over. In such a situation, a writ of mandamus could not be issued to compel the State to act against the statute.
Conclusion: The claim to be deemed Government servants from 1.1.1971 was rejected, and the direction for regularisation was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the High Court's order was set aside, and the writ petition was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory takeover becomes effective only upon completion of the prescribed recommendation and acceptance process, employees excluded by that scheme cannot claim takeover status or regularisation, and no mandamus can compel action contrary to the statute.