Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the estimated warranty costs on vehicles sold were deductible in the year of sale under the income tax provisions.
Analysis: The subject matter of tax under section 65(2)(a) was profits or gains derived from business, but deductions were controlled by sections 101 and 104. The governing question under section 104 was whether the expenditure or loss had been incurred, meaning that the taxpayer had become definitively committed to the liability. Although the warranty liability was expressed in contingent form and depended on defects being notified within the warranty period, the surrounding commercial facts showed that a substantial and ascertainable proportion of vehicles were defective at the time of sale and that the likely remedial cost could be reasonably estimated. The Court treated theoretical contingencies as insufficient to prevent accrual where, in substance, the taxpayer had become committed to meet the warranty costs.
Conclusion: The warranty costs were deductible in the year of sale under section 104, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A liability may be treated as incurred for income tax purposes where, despite contingent wording, the taxpayer is in substance definitively committed to an estimable expenditure arising from existing facts.