Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dealer should be permitted to produce Form D-1 to claim concessional tax treatment, and whether the assessment and appellate orders deserved to be set aside with a fresh decision by the Assessing Authority.
Analysis: The appeal arose under section 36 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The dispute centred on the dealer's claim for concessional tax on the basis of Form D-1, which had not been produced at the earlier stage. The Court followed the earlier decision holding that where requisite forms were not produced during assessment, the matter could be remitted so that the Assessing Authority could examine the genuineness and admissibility of the documents and then pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The dealer was entitled to have Form D-1 considered, and the assessment, appellate, and tribunal orders were set aside with a direction to decide the matter afresh; the issue was answered in favour of the dealer and against the Department.