Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sanction granted for reopening the assessment under the proviso to Section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was sustainable when the order contained no reasons, and whether the limitation period for passing a fresh sanction order and for reassessment was attracted.
Analysis: The impugned sanction order was examined and found to be devoid of reasons. The governing requirement under the proviso to Section 21(2) is that reasons, though brief, must be recorded before sanctioning reopening of assessment. In the absence of any reasoned basis, the sanction could not be sustained. The Court also protected the matter from being defeated by limitation for the purpose of fresh consideration and consequential reassessment.
Conclusion: The sanction order was set aside, the reassessment notice was also quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.