Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rooms and cottages let out by a club to its members and guests constitute a "hotel" liable to luxury tax under the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act, 1976.
Analysis: The Act levies luxury tax on accommodation provided in a hotel, and "hotel" is defined as a building or part of a building where residential accommodation is provided by way of business for monetary consideration. The definition is not confined to establishments engaged exclusively in guest accommodation, and the identity of the occupants as members or guests does not alter the character of the activity. On the statutory language, if a part of a club premises is used for providing residential accommodation for consideration in the course of the club's activities, it answers the description of a hotel for the purposes of the Act. The separate levy on clubs under section 4(2A) was held to create an additional liability and not to exclude the liability otherwise attracted under section 4.
Conclusion: The club's rooms and cottages are exigible to luxury tax under the Act, and the assessment orders were upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: For the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act, 1976, any part of a club premises used to provide residential accommodation by way of business for monetary consideration is a hotel liable to luxury tax, irrespective of whether the occupants are members or their guests.