Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales of reading books including text books by the assessee were exempt from tax under the notification issued under section 17(1) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether the revisional order setting aside the appellate authority's grant of exemption was sustainable.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption from tax on sales of reading books including text books by any dealer. The appellate authority had recorded a factual finding that the assessee was a dealer and had sold reading books. On that finding, the exemption squarely applied. The precedent relied upon to deny exemption was distinguished on facts, as it concerned a printer of materials on publishers' specifications and did not govern a case where the assessee was found to be a dealer selling reading books. The revisional authority's reliance on that decision was therefore misplaced.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exemption, and the revisional order restoring the assessment was unsustainable.