Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional authority had jurisdiction under section 20(2) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 to revise the assessment order passed by an authority not subordinate to it.
Analysis: Section 20(2) confers revisional power only in respect of orders passed by authorities subordinate to the revising authority. Rule 44A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 specifies the hierarchy of authorities deemed subordinate for the purpose of revisional power. On that scheme, a Deputy Commissioner could not exercise revision over an assessment order passed by the consequential order of an Appellate Deputy Commissioner, since the order sought to be revised was not one passed by a subordinate authority within the meaning of the provision and the rule.
Conclusion: The revisional order was without jurisdiction and was invalid.
Final Conclusion: The connected assessment consequences based on the invalid revision could not survive, and the writ petitions succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Revisional power under section 20(2) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 can be exercised only over orders of subordinate authorities as defined by the applicable hierarchy rule.