Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods supplied by the principal to its carrying and forwarding agent could be treated as an independent sale liable to tax under Explanation (c) of section 2(u) of the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002.
Analysis: Section 2(u) defines "sale" as a transfer of property in goods for consideration, and Explanation (c) deems two independent sales or purchases where goods move from a principal to a selling agent and then to the purchaser. The decisive inquiry is whether the arrangement is a true contract of agency or a transfer of title amounting to a sale. On the facts, the agent was only authorised to supply the goods to distributors or buyers on commission and did not acquire ownership of the goods. The goods continued to belong to the principal until sale to the ultimate buyer, so the movement of goods to the agent did not create a separate taxable sale.
Conclusion: The delivery of goods by the principal to its agent was not a taxable independent sale, and tax could be levied only on the sale to the ultimate purchaser. The petition was therefore decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In a genuine principal-agent arrangement, mere delivery of goods to the agent does not constitute a sale unless title to the goods passes; a deemed-sale provision cannot be applied to tax a transaction that remains one of agency.