Valid composition tax registration must be honoured; regular-rate assessment cannot replace it merely due to turnover mix.

Under the Karnataka VAT composition scheme, a valid and uncancelled composition registration certificate must be given effect during the relevant period. The revenue cannot deny composition benefits and apply the regular tax rate merely because one line of business accounts for a larger share of turnover, where the dealers were operating hotel business under the subsisting certificate. The commentary notes that small turnover from coffee, tea and snacks did not justify ignoring the certificate, and that the revisional approach based only on turnover composition was unsustainable in law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the revisional authority was justified in denying the composition tax benefit and levying tax at the regular rate despite the composition registration certificate remaining in force during the relevant period.

Analysis: The appellants had obtained registration under the Karnataka Value Added Tax regime and had been issued a composition tax registration certificate for the relevant period. The certificate had not been cancelled by the competent authority. The fact that the turnover from coffee, tea and snacks was comparatively small and that the business earlier consisted mainly of ice cream sales did not justify denying the composition scheme when the dealers had also commenced hotel business and were operating under the subsisting certificate. The revisional authority set aside the appellate order solely on the basis of turnover composition and treated the ancillary sales as incidental, but that approach was held to be unsustainable in law. Once the composition registration remained valid, the revenue could not ignore it and assess the dealers under the regular rate for the period in question.

Conclusion: The question of law was answered in favour of the assessees, and the revisional orders were unsustainable.

Ratio Decidendi: So long as a composition tax registration certificate remains valid and uncancelled, the revenue cannot deny the composition benefit and levy tax under the regular provision merely because one line of business contributes a larger share of turnover.

---