1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Transfer of assets as sale for tax purposes; Representation in balance-sheet binds</h1> The court held that the transfer of plant and machinery from the respondent-assessee to its holding company should be treated as a sale for sales tax ... - Issues:The issues involved in this case are whether the plant and machinery transferred by the respondent-assessee to its holding company constitute moveable or immovable properties, and whether the transfer should be treated as a sale for the purpose of levying sales tax.Plant and Machinery Classification:The respondent-assessee contended that the plant and machinery transferred were immovable properties, thus not subject to sales tax. However, the assessing officer treated the transfer as a sale. The Tribunal held that the machinery, specifically a boiler and its accessories, were immovable properties without conducting an independent investigation into their removability. The assessing officer found that the boiler was purchased and installed by the respondent-assessee, indicating it could be removed if desired. The Tribunal concluded that the transfer was a book adjustment due to the holding company relationship.Estoppel and Representation:The court found that the respondent-assessee, by representing the transfer of plant and machinery in its balance-sheet, was estopped from later claiming it was merely a book adjustment. The representation in Schedule 10 of the balance-sheet clearly indicated a transfer had occurred, preventing a contradictory stance. Consequently, the court set aside the Tribunal and first appellate authority's orders, reinstating the assessing officer's decision.This judgment highlights the importance of consistent representations and the impact of estoppel in legal proceedings involving property transfers and taxation assessments.