Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 76(6) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was leviable where the goods in transit were accompanied by the basic transport documents but form VAT-47 was produced along with the reply to the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The goods and the accompanying documents were not found to be forged or unauthentic. The statutory defect regarding non-accompaniment of form VAT-47 under section 76(2)(b) read with rule 53 stood cured when the form was filed with the reply to the notice. That circumstance supported the bona fides of the transaction and negatived any inference of tax evasion necessary to justify penalty. The facts were treated as covered by the principle that subsequent production of the required declaration with the reply indicates compliance and does not, by itself, warrant penal action.
Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable and the assessee succeeded on this issue.