1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Urban Development Authority entitled to concessional rate as local authority under State law. Appeal allowed.</h1> The Court held that the Authority, created under the Urban Development Authority Act, is a local authority of the State, managed by a Commissioner ... - Issues involved: Jurisdiction of revisional authority to determine exemption eligibility under notification u/s 22(1) of Karnataka Sales Tax Act.The appellant, a cement pipe manufacturer, supplied goods to Bagalkot Town Development Authority and collected tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act based on a concessional rate notification. The Additional Commissioner initiated suo motu revision, contending that the Authority is not a creation of the State and the concessional rate is invalid. The main issue is whether the Authority should be considered a Department of the State for tax purposes. The Court found that the Authority, created under the Urban Development Authority Act, is a local authority of the State, managed by a Commissioner appointed by the State. The Court held that the concessional rate applicable to the Government should extend to the Authority. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the Additional Commissioner's order and confirming the Joint Commissioner's order.