Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim was barred by limitation under Rule 11 read with Rule 173-J of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Duty debited to the personal ledger account was treated as a deposit made for removal of goods, while the actual assessment was made later on the RT-12 statement by the proper officer. On that basis, the date of payment of duty was taken to be the date of assessment, and the refund application filed on 9-4-1973 was held to be within time because the relevant clearances could not have been finally assessed earlier than May 1972.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not time-barred and the revision was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: For refund limitation purposes under the Central Excise Rules, 1944, duty paid in advance through the personal ledger account is to be treated as paid on the date of assessment by the proper officer, not on the earlier date of clearance.