Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether alum, sodium sulphide lye, sodium sulphate, Daicol (Gaur gums) and fluo solid lime used in the manufacture of paper were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 201/79, as amended by Notification No. 105/82, as raw materials.
Analysis: The term "raw material" was held to require contextual interpretation depending on the facts of each case. Chemicals which are added to pulp stock or used in the recognised paper-making process and which serve a distinct and definitive purpose in that process were treated as raw materials. Alum used in the pulp stock was distinguished from alum used only for treatment of water. Sodium sulphide lye, sodium sulphate, Daicol (Gaur gums) and fluo solid lime were found to be essential inputs in the normal manufacture of paper, and the stage at which sodium sulphate was added in the recovery cycle was held not to alter its character as a raw material.
Conclusion: The specified chemicals, including alum to the extent used in the pulp stock, qualified as raw materials and were eligible for the notification benefit.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the disputed items were held entitled to the exemption benefit under the relevant notifications.
Ratio Decidendi: A substance used as an essential input in the normal and recognised manufacturing process is a raw material for exemption purposes, even if its point of introduction in the process is dictated by convenience rather than by the immediate stage of conversion.