Export under bond did not eliminate duty where rebate was restricted under the Central Excise Rules and notification.

The text analyses whether excisable goods exported under bond under Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 remained liable to duty to the extent rebate was not available under Rule 12 and Notification No. 349/77. It treats Rules 9, 9A, 12, 13 and 14A as an integrated scheme: duty is the general rule before removal, export under bond permits removal without payment, and fiscal consequences arise on breach of export conditions. On that reasoning, the rebate restriction under Rule 12 was said to continue to apply even to export under bond, so duty was payable to the extent of the unrebated amount. The commentary records that the issue was resolved in favour of Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether excisable goods exported under bond under Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 were liable to duty to the extent of the unrebated amount under Rule 12 and Notification No. 349/77 dated 16-12-1977.

Analysis: The scheme of Rules 9, 9A, 12, 13 and 14A was read as an integrated code governing removal, export under bond, levy on diversion to home consumption, failure to export, and failure to furnish proof of export. Rule 9 made duty payment the general rule before removal, Rule 13 carved out export under bond without payment of duty, and Rule 9A(3) and Rule 14A attached fiscal consequences only on breach of the export conditions. On that basis, the contention that Rule 13 exports must still bear the unrebated duty applicable under Rule 12 had force. However, following the earlier Delhi High Court view, the Tribunal held that the rebate restriction under Rule 12 and the notification applied even to export under bond, and that duty was payable to the extent of the unrebated amount.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of Revenue and against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appellate order was held to be incorrect and was set aside, resulting in allowance of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Export under bond under Rule 13 did not displace the duty burden to the extent preserved by the rebate structure under Rule 12 and the relevant notification.

---