1985 (5) TMI 224 - AT - Customs

Tribunal rules in favor of appellant on Project Import regulations for color film equipment

SATISH KUMAR GOYAL, NEW DELHI Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of Project Import regulations for automatic and computerized ... - Issues:- Interpretation of Project Import regulations for automatic and computerized equipment for developing color films.- Classification of color photo processing laboratories as industrial plants under Customs Tariff Act.- Admissibility of Project Import facility for mini color laboratories.- Consideration of judgment by Madras High Court in similar case.Interpretation of Project Import Regulations:The appellant imported automatic and computerized equipment for developing color films under a Project Import license. The Assistant Collector refused registration under Heading 84.66 of the Customs Tariff Schedule, stating that color photo processing laboratories did not qualify as industrial plants. The appellant argued that all requirements for duty concession were fulfilled, citing a government circular supporting the admissibility of Project Import for such equipment. The appellant also referenced previous cases where similar equipment received Project Import concession. The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with regulations and the government circular, ultimately setting aside the Collector of Customs (Appeals) order in favor of the appellant.Classification of Color Photo Processing Laboratories:The dispute centered around whether color photo processing laboratories could be classified as industrial plants under the Customs Tariff Act. The Assistant Collector and the Collector (Appeals) held that activities like developing, printing, and processing color films did not constitute manufacturing or production. The appellant argued that the equipment imported was essential for a small-scale industry registered for processing and printing color films. The Tribunal, considering the judgment of the Madras High Court in a similar case, concluded that the activities of the appellant fell within the scope of Project Import regulations, overturning the previous decision.Admissibility of Project Import for Mini Color Laboratories:The appellant contended that Project Import facility should apply to mini color laboratories based on a government circular clarifying the eligibility of such facilities for duty concessions. The Tribunal acknowledged the circular's stance and the precedent set by previous cases where similar equipment received Project Import concessions. By referencing the judgment of the Madras High Court, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing compliance with regulatory requirements and government directives.Consideration of Madras High Court Judgment:The Tribunal highlighted the judgment of the Madras High Court in a case involving similar facts and equipment imported by another party. In light of the Madras High Court's decision favoring Project Import concession for such equipment, and the absence of contradictory judgments from other High Courts or the Supreme Court, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal set aside the Collector of Customs (Appeals) order and granted consequential relief to the appellant based on the precedent established by the Madras High Court judgment.