Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fully automatic and computerised colour film processing equipment imported for a mini colour laboratory was entitled to project import concession under Heading 84.66; whether such a colour processing laboratory could be treated as an industrial plant for that purpose.
Analysis: The import was supported by the requisite licence and sponsoring authority recommendation under the Project Import (Registration of Contract) Regulation, 1965. A Government circular also indicated that project import facility was admissible for an automatic colour film process laboratory subject to usual conditions. The decision was further guided by the Madras High Court ruling on identical facts, and there was no contrary view from any other High Court or the Supreme Court. In that setting, the tribunal did not accept the departmental objection that the laboratory was merely a service or job industry and declined to re-examine the merits against the settled view.
Conclusion: The import qualified for project import treatment and the assessee was entitled to the concession.
Final Conclusion: The appellate order denying project import benefit was set aside and relief followed in consequence.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the import satisfies the project import conditions and a colour film processing laboratory is covered by the accepted interpretation of the relevant tariff heading, project import concession cannot be denied merely on the ground that the activity is characterised as a service industry.