Substantial compliance for proforma credit: wrong notification citation could not defeat an otherwise eligible claim.

Proforma credit for optical bleaching agent RANIPAL used in detergent cake manufacture could not be denied merely because the assessee's application cited the wrong notification number. The Department did not dispute the item's eligibility under the relevant exemption notification, and the record showed substantial compliance through the communication seeking credit, RT-12 returns, and verification of the RG 23 Part II register. An incorrect statutory citation did not defeat an otherwise valid claim where the substance of the request was clear. The adverse order was set aside, and the assessee was entitled to avail proforma credit from 30-7-1979.

---

---

Issues: Whether proforma credit in respect of optical bleaching agent RANIPAL, used as a raw material in the manufacture of detergent cakes, could be denied merely because the assessee's application mentioned the wrong notification number instead of the correct exemption notification.

Analysis: The assessee had made a communication seeking permission to avail proforma credit for RANIPAL, and the Department did not dispute that the item was eligible under the relevant exemption notification. The only objection was the misdescription of the notification number in the application. The governing principle applied was that procedural requirements are satisfied by substantial compliance and that a mistaken label or incorrect citation does not defeat an otherwise valid claim where the substance of the request is clear. The assessed RT-12 returns and verification of the RG 23 Part II register also supported the conclusion that the Department was aware of the credit claim and had processed it accordingly.

Conclusion: The assessee's claim could not be rejected on the technical ground of wrong citation of the notification. The assessee was entitled to avail proforma credit from 30-7-1979, and the adverse order was set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the substance of an or claim clearly discloses entitlement, an incorrect statutory or notification reference does not invalidate the claim if there is substantial compliance with the procedural requirement.

---