Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excess duty paid on the finished product could be refunded in cash when part of the payment was adjusted through RG 23 credit under Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The relevant rule expressly provided that no part of the credit in RG 23 account could be refunded in cash or by cheque. The special provision allowing utilisation of unutilised credit in specified circumstances did not dilute the general prohibition against cash refund of such credit. The refund provision for excess duty did not authorise conversion of a statutory credit into a cash refund merely because excess duty had been collected on the finished product. The proper course, if any credit was available for adjustment, was credit to the RG 23 account, not cash payment.
Conclusion: The claim for cash refund of the excess amount was not maintainable and was rejected.