Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant's claim for reassessment under Heading 90.28(i) should be examined on the basis of the documents produced before the Tribunal and the matter remanded to the lower authority for decision.
Analysis: The claim under Heading 90.28(i) had not been examined by the lower authorities because the appellant had earlier proceeded on a different basis. The Tribunal held that, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the new claim could be examined and that the supporting technical material produced before it should be considered by the lower authority. The Tribunal therefore directed that copies of the documents be produced before the lower authority and limited the remand to the appellant's claim under the said heading alone.
Conclusion: The appellant's claim under Heading 90.28(i) was ordered to be examined afresh by the Assistant Collector on remand, and the impugned order was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the classification issue was reopened and sent back for fresh adjudication confined to the specified heading.