Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether carbon black feed stock with sulphur content of 0.5% was correctly treated as low sulphur fuel oil and subjected to duty at the higher rate under the relevant excise notification, notwithstanding the contention that it was used as a feed stock and not as fuel.
Analysis: The decisive consideration was that the goods were assessable under Item 10 of the Central Excise Tariff, which covered furnace oil, a fuel oil. The assessee had sought the benefit of preferential assessment as something other than low sulphur fuel oil, but did not establish what other tariff description would apply. The sulphur content of 0.5% was found to be low in absolute terms and also when compared with the sulphur specifications for fuel oils referred to in the record. The fact that the product was not actually used as fuel did not displace its character for tariff and notification purposes, because the assessment turned on the prescribed specifications and tariff classification.
Conclusion: The product was rightly treated as low sulphur fuel oil and was liable to duty at the higher rate. The assessee's challenge failed.