Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a quota certificate for motor vehicle parts entitled the petitioner to an import licence for spare parts of crawler and agricultural tractors under the revised import policy, and whether an earlier licence allegedly granted by mistake could support such a claim.
Analysis: The revised import schedule grouped several items under one heading, but the identity of each item remained distinct. A quota certificate for one item did not authorise import of another item merely because both were placed under the same heading. The detailed policy in Appendix 26 showed that a quota licence for motor vehicle parts was confined to motor vehicle parts and did not extend to spare parts of crawler and agricultural tractors. The earlier licence said to have been granted for petrol, gas and kerosene engine parts was treated as a departmental mistake and could not be used to establish a general entitlement under the import policy.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to the claimed import licence, and the writ petition failed.