Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether platinum and rhodium gauzes used in the intermediate manufacture of nitric acid, which was further converted into nitroglycerine and ammonium nitrate for use in explosives, qualified as materials used in the manufacture of explosives so as to entitle the assessee to credit under Rule 56A.
Analysis: The gauzes were not the final ingredient of explosives, but the record showed that they were used in the process of producing nitric acid, which was then converted into substances that formed essential components of explosives. The requirement under Rule 56A was treated as satisfied where the material, though subjected to chemical conversion or indirect use, was ultimately employed in the manufacture of the finished product. The cited notifications and prior appellate decisions were consistent with this approach and supported allowance of credit even where the input did not itself become a component part of the final product.
Conclusion: The gauzes were held to be used in the manufacture of explosives, and the assessee was entitled to credit under Rule 56A. The objection to availment of the procedure and credit was rejected, and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Materials indirectly used in the manufacturing chain are eligible for credit under Rule 56A if they are ultimately employed in the manufacture of the final excisable product, even though they do not themselves form part of that product.