Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the 25% excise relief retained by the manufacturer under the exemption notification formed part of the assessable value for excise duty purposes.
Analysis: The relief notification was intended to encourage higher production, but the later retrospective amendment to the excise valuation provisions clarified that the duty payable under the Act is only the effective duty of excise after giving full effect to any exemption. Money recovered by the manufacturer as duty, but not actually payable as duty under the Act, cannot be treated as duty for valuation. Since the amount retained by the manufacturer was not shown to be any other deductible item such as sales tax, it had to be included in the assessable value.
Conclusion: The 25% amount retained by the manufacturer was not deductible as duty and was correctly included in the assessable value, against the assessee.